Who or what was studied?
Was the work done in cells, animals or humans? If humans, were their age, health and circumstances relevant to you? A finding in one setting is a reason for further investigation, not an automatic promise in another.
What changed?
Was the outcome survival, day-to-day function, a symptom or a laboratory marker? These are different results. An improvement in a marker is not by itself evidence that people lived longer or felt better.
What was it compared with?
Look for a suitable comparison group and ask how participants were selected. Check the size and duration of the study. A testimonial or a change over time in one person cannot establish that the advertised intervention caused the change.
What were the downsides and who paid?
Read beyond the headline for adverse effects, dropouts, uncertainty and funding. Check whether independent research supports the conclusion. A seller quoting a study about an ingredient has not necessarily tested its own formulation or programme.
What decision does this justify?
If you cannot explain the claimed benefit, its uncertainty and its relevance to you, pause the purchase. Take the actual study and product information to a suitably qualified professional rather than a screenshot of the marketing headline. This is an evidence-reading checklist, not an assessment of any treatment.
Scope
This is an editorial planning checklist, not a tested product review, clinical recommendation or destination endorsement.
General information, not individual medical advice. Prepared by Recovery Bench from the sources and distinctions stated here; no clinical review is claimed.
About this guide
Published by Recovery Bench. Read our research and editorial standards or see how supplier links work.